ARTICLES
WILLS, TRUSTS, ESTATES
PERSONAL INJURY
REAL ESTATE
CLOSINGS
CORPORATION LAW

|



 |
ESTATE PLANNING THAT KEEPS WEALTH IN THE FAMILY
You've worked hard for the financial assets that you've built up over
the years. If you want to pass them to your loved ones instead of to the
government, read on. I'm going to show you some simple strategies that
will enable you to completely wipe out or slash the estate tax your
heirs will have to pay.
First of all, remember that you and your spouse can each pass on up
to $625,000 of assets to heirs, free of federal estate and gift tax,
either while you're alive or in your estates. That's a total of $1.2
million free of estate or gift taxes.
An unlimited marital deduction lets you give as much property as you
wish to your spouse free of estate or gift taxes. But this only defers
the potential estate tax liability until the inheriting spouse dies.
Once a taxable estate passes $625,000, a fierce estate tax kicks in at
37% and climbs to as high as 55%. That means that if, like most couples,
you use only one $625,000 exclusion, the estate tax on $1 million --
your home, retirement plan, life insurance, etc. -- could exceed
$150,000.
If the value of your estate is greater than $625,000, these simple,
proven moves will move assets that you may not need out of your estate
forever:
Estate tax slasher #1: Make gifts during your lifetime. This
is all that most of us will ever need to do. Just be sure, before you
give any property away, that you'll have enough to maintain a
comfortable retirement. You can give up to $10,000 per recipient --
children, grandchildren or anybody else -- each year free of gift or
income tax. If your spouse joins you in making the gifts, that doubles
your annual gift-tax exclusion to $20,000 per recipient. Depending on
the size of your family, you could shift $100,000 or more out of your
estate each year.
Sometimes it pays to make even larger annual gifts than
$10,000/$20,000. Even though you'd trigger current gift or estate tax,
you'd remove property from your estate that's likely to appreciate
substantially over the years. You could even give away your home, while
continuing to live in it - or shares of a closely held business.
It may pay for you to consider the cost basis of property you give
away during your lifetime. If you have a loss, sell the property first,
then give the proceeds. Then you can take a loss deduction on your own
tax return. If you have a gain, remember that the gift's cost basis for
income tax purposes is the donor's basis. So when the property is later
sold, the recipient is taxed on the entire gain. But if appreciated
property is inherited in an estate, it receives a "stepped-up"
basis. This means the asset's value is figured as of the owner's death
rather than based on its original cost. The benefit here is that there
is no income-tax liability.
Estate tax slasher #2: Don't leave everything to your spouse
in your estate. Instead, use some or all of your $625,000 estate tax
exclusion for other heirs. Then, at your spouse's death, estate tax will
be avoided again on his or her first $625,000.
There are several ways to do this. One is simply to leave some assets
to other family members. Just make sure that your spouse will have
enough liquid assets to live comfortably.
Another solution is to give your spouse assets while you're alive.
The unlimited marital deduction applies here, too, so you can give as
much as you want free of gift tax. Suppose you have $1 million and your
spouse has $200,000. You could transfer $400,000 to him or her. Then, no
matter which of you dies first, $625,000 will pass to other heirs
tax-free. Another approach is to set up a bypass trust. This gives your
spouse use of the assets while he or she is alive, and removes them from
your taxable estate.
Let's say that you own $800,000 of assets and your spouse has
$300,000. A bypass trust could hold up to $625,000 of your estate, with
$200,000 given directly to your spouse, free of federal tax. Your spouse
collects the trust's income. At his or her death, other heirs get the
trust assets. Since the assets aren't part of your spouse's estate, it's
as if the $625,000 were left directly to them. Meanwhile, that $500,000
estate ($300,000 plus the $200,000 given in your will) falls within the
federal estate and gift exemption.
Each spouse can bequeath $625,000 to a separate trust. Both can
provide for a trust, so that one will be set up at the first spouse's
death no matter who dies first.
Estate tax slasher #3: Buy life insurance so that your estate
will keep its full value. As I pointed out last month, life insurance
enables you to transfer as much wealth as possible in an estate. This
may be important if a married couple's estate exceeds $1.2 million. Life
insurance policy proceeds are often free of estate tax and income tax
(see the explanation below).
Another reason to consider using life insurance for estate planning
is to furnish enough cash to pay estate tax and other expenses for
estates with assets that your heirs do not want to sell, or that would
be hard to sell quickly, such as real estate or a closely held business.
This might also come into play if you want to provide estate
"equalization" among heirs. Suppose you own a closely held
business in which one child, but not others, will actively participate.
One solution is to give the active child the business itself and give
other heirs other assets. If the "other" assets aren't of
equal value on a per-heir basis, life insurance proceeds can fill the
gap.
In your planning, remember that proceeds of life insurance policies
will avoid estate tax only if they are owned outside the insured's
estate. And if your spouse is the policy beneficiary, the insurance
proceeds will go into his or her estate and become taxable at the time
of the second death. (That may or may not be an estate-tax factor for
you.) Instead, life insurance might be owned by and payable to either
other heirs themselves or by an irrevocable trust that you set up.
|